
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wildlife Photographer of the Year Discredited</title>
	<link>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited</link>
	<description>Food - Photography &#038; More</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: miles</title>
		<link>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25058</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25058</guid>
					<description>Rod/Anne
It's a real shame but hopefully it will deter others from trying it.

Miles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod/Anne<br />
It&#8217;s a real shame but hopefully it will deter others from trying it.</p>
<p>Miles
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25052</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25052</guid>
					<description>Miles,
I would think it very difficult to make judgments in photograph these days.  There are so many first class shots now and with the innovations, equipment etc. how can it all be judged?  I am not sure why there were no runner ups in this case.  It seems unfair not to give an award at all when there must have been a significant amount of entries, unless they have rewritten the rules in the middle of it all.
"A bit of a sorry mess and hopefully a lesson learnt".  Indeed!
Anne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miles,<br />
I would think it very difficult to make judgments in photograph these days.  There are so many first class shots now and with the innovations, equipment etc. how can it all be judged?  I am not sure why there were no runner ups in this case.  It seems unfair not to give an award at all when there must have been a significant amount of entries, unless they have rewritten the rules in the middle of it all.<br />
&#8220;A bit of a sorry mess and hopefully a lesson learnt&#8221;.  Indeed!<br />
Anne
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25042</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.milescollins.com/wordpress/wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-discredited#comment-25042</guid>
					<description>Miles,
&lt;i&gt;Why they didn’t pay the prize money in the first place is beyond me&lt;/i&gt;

There's a story there already if you ask me - you've hit the nail on the head I think
Cheers
Rod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miles,<br />
<i>Why they didn’t pay the prize money in the first place is beyond me</i></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a story there already if you ask me - you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head I think<br />
Cheers<br />
Rod
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

