New Canon 60D
A new dslr from Canon…
Looks as though Canon are set to announce the upgrade from the EOS 50D, the EOS 60D. I’ve not seen the exact spec details yet but word has it that it’s got the same pixel count as the EOS 7D but without the magnesium body. Apparently it is smaller than the 50D but has a new screen and I would assume video capapbility is a given. So another model to bridge the gap between the 500D and 7D and most likely a camera to challenge Nikon’s D90.
There is still no concrete information regarding the replacement of the flagship 1DS Mark Three. Web talk would suggest the new version could have a lower pixel count than the current model but with huge improvements to quality. I would expect this to be a camera aimed squarely at stills and video photographers with a price tag to match. The pixel count will be interesting in as much as Canon have shown their hand somewhat with the G11 compact which has a reduced count from the earlier G10. It’s getting harder to see where camera quality can be fundamently improved in terms of picture quality to the naked eye.
Whatever happens the Canon-Nikon competition is alive and well.
Good news for you, Miles. . . but I’m a Nikon girl and always will be.
My old D80 gave some great shots in Italy this past. I like the big case and the sturdiness of the Nikons. Mine take a beating and keep on performing. Countless times smacked against a hard surface and still functioning beautifully - like the old Samsonite luggage commercials
Its just a camera (and a brand) that I feel comfortable with and that’s ultimately what’s important for any photographer.
Cheers!
L
August 16, 2010 @ 5:01 pm
Laura,
Welcome back! Glad you had a good time. I won’t be buying one, it’s a mid level camera so there’s no point really. You make a good point, I think most of us stick with what we’ve always known, I certainly have with Canon.
Miles
August 16, 2010 @ 6:32 pm
I wouldn’t buy this one but I wouldn’t mind a 1DS MKIII
Nikon v Canon
I think it’s like Mercedes v BMW - you’re one or the other and it makes no difference which way you go
Cheers
Rod
August 16, 2010 @ 6:51 pm
Rod,
I’d go 1D Mark1V now, word is that it’s better than both the big Nikon’s in terms of burst rate and image quality-wonder how the 1DS will compete to be honest.
Miles
August 16, 2010 @ 11:40 pm
Miles,
I’m thinking full frame picture quality - that’s all. I think the MK III v MK IV could be the same as 5D v 7D
Best
Rod
PS, MK IVs are the single most common camera I see when I’m out and about - I kid you not
August 17, 2010 @ 7:48 pm
I think that the Nikon v Canon thing gets more interesting when looking at the pro models. Intro and mid range I see little difference and reckon anyone would be happy with whatever they chose.
But the pro models. From what I have seen, Nikon are far superior with regard to noise at higher iso and therefore have a camera with more reach and versatility.
On the other hand, Canon have the L lenses……
I own a mid range Canon by the way.
August 19, 2010 @ 4:49 pm
Sam,
The top end Nikons are brilliant but I’d agree about the Canon pro lenses. All that said I’ve seen a few reviews were the new superfast Canon has been prefered to the D3’s…it’s all down to personal choice in the end.
Miles
August 19, 2010 @ 6:25 pm